TruAlign

Exercises

Chapter 18: Regret, Memory Bias, and Returning

Reflection & Exercises

Exercise 1 — Regret type assessment (10 minutes)

If they've expressed regret or returned, identify which type:

Type 1: Missing you specifically

  • Can they name specific qualities about you and the relationship?
  • Or is it vague: "I made a mistake," "I miss you"?

Type 2: Missing having someone

  • Are they lonely, struggling, or in crisis right now?
  • Would anyone fill this void, or only you?

Type 3: Regret about how it ended

  • Do they want closure, or reconciliation?
  • Are they seeking forgiveness, or a second chance?

Type 4: Nostalgia (memory editing)

  • Can they remember why it ended, or just the good times?
  • Have structural issues been forgotten?

Type 5: Current situation isn't working

  • Is their return driven by something failing elsewhere?
  • Are they comparing, or genuinely ready?

Type 6: Seeking validation

  • Do they want to know you still care?
  • Or do they actually want to try again?

Type 7: Genuine recognition + capacity

  • Have they done structural work?
  • Can they name what broke and what's changed?

Only Type 7 indicates potential for healthy reconciliation. Others are emotional responses without capacity.


Exercise 2 — Memory accuracy check (8 minutes)

If they're returning with regret, assess memory accuracy:

Questions to ask (or observe):

  1. Can they name what structurally broke the relationship?

    • Specific patterns, not just "we fought" or "I messed up"
  2. Do they remember why they left?

    • Or has memory edited out their original reasons?
  3. Can they acknowledge both good and bad?

    • Or only romanticizing the positive?
  4. Have they forgotten the pain/conflict?

    • "It wasn't that bad" = memory editing
  5. Can they see their contribution without deflecting?

    • Genuine accountability, or vague apologies?

If memory has been significantly edited: Nostalgia isn't the same as readiness. They're responding to an idealized version that didn't exist.


Exercise 3 — Readiness vs desperation test (10 minutes)

Assess whether return is from groundedness or activation:

Readiness indicators:

  • They've done months of work (therapy, practice, capacity-building)
  • They're not in crisis—they're regulated and clear
  • They can articulate what needs to be different specifically
  • They have support structures in place
  • They understand reconciliation is work, not just desire
  • They're not rushing; they're patient and grounded

Desperation indicators:

  • They're in crisis (loneliness, new relationship failed, struggling)
  • They're activated—urgent, pressuring, panicked
  • They can't name specifics—just "I need you" or "I made a mistake"
  • No support structures or evidence of work
  • They want immediate reconciliation to end discomfort
  • They're rushing; they need relief now

The distinction: Readiness is grounded. Desperation is activated. Desperation creates temporary reunions that fail quickly.


Exercise 4 — Structural change evidence tracker (ongoing)

If they've returned, track evidence over 30-90 days:

ClaimBehavioral evidenceConsistent?Under stress?
"I've changed"What specific behaviors demonstrate this?Yes / NoYes / No
"I understand now"Can they articulate patterns without prompting?Yes / NoYes / No
"I've worked on myself"What support structures are in place?Yes / NoYes / No
"It'll be different"What's specifically different?Yes / NoYes / No

The standard: If claims don't have behavioral evidence that persists under stress, it's not real change—it's promises.


Exercise 5 — The "would I advise a friend?" test (7 minutes)

Imagine your friend tells you their ex has returned:

They describe:

  • How long they've been apart
  • What the ex is saying now
  • What evidence of change exists
  • Why they left originally
  • What's structurally different

What would you tell your friend?

Most people give better advice to friends than they take themselves. Apply your objectivity.


Exercise 6 — Your own readiness assessment (10 minutes)

If they've returned, assess your readiness honestly:

1. Are you accepting them back from:

  • Loneliness? (If yes, pause. This isn't readiness.)
  • Relief they're back? (If yes, pause. This isn't sustainable.)
  • Genuine belief structure has changed? (Evidence required.)
  • Hope they've changed without evidence? (Fantasy, not readiness.)

2. Have you built your own capacity during separation?

  • Therapy, regulation skills, boundary practice?
  • Or were you frozen waiting?

3. Can you hold complexity?

  • Hope and protection, not just relief?
  • Try again and be okay if it doesn't work?

4. Would you accept the relationship as-is permanently?

  • If nothing's different, are you settling?

If you're accepting return from loneliness, relief, or hope without evidence: You're not ready either. Both people need readiness.


Exercise 7 — The "what's different?" specificity test (10 minutes)

If they claim things will be different, demand specificity:

Vague claims (not enough):

  • "I've changed"
  • "I understand now"
  • "It'll be different this time"
  • "I've learned my lesson"

Specific answers (required):

  • "I've been in therapy for 8 months working on [specific pattern]"
  • "I've learned [specific skill] and can demonstrate it under stress"
  • "I can now [specific behavior] instead of [old pattern]"
  • "I have [support structure] in place for accountability"

The test: If they can't be specific, it's not real. Vague promises aren't readiness.


Exercise 8 — Timeline reality check (5 minutes)

If they've returned, check if timeline aligns with actual change:

Time apart:

  • Less than 3 months → Unlikely sufficient for real integration
  • 3-6 months → Possible early change if evidence exists
  • 6-12 months → More realistic timeline for capacity-building
  • 12+ months → Enough time for integration if work was done

Evidence required:

  • What did they do during that time?
  • Not just "thought about things"—actual capacity-building work

If timeline is short and no evidence exists: This is desperation or nostalgia, not readiness.


Reflection prompts

  • Why are they returning: loneliness, crisis, or genuine readiness?
  • Can they name what broke structurally, or just "I miss you"?
  • Is memory accurate, or has it been edited?
  • What evidence of capacity-building exists?
  • Am I accepting return from loneliness or genuine belief in change?
  • Would I advise a friend to try again in this situation?
  • Can they be specific about what's different?
  • Does timeline align with realistic change?
  • Can I hold hope and protection?
  • What would need to be true for this to work?

Related reading