TruAlign

Examples

Chapter 15: When Distance Helps vs Hardens

Scenarios & Examples

Scenario 1 — Distance that helps: Breaking the pursue/withdraw cycle

What happened:

You were in a pursue/withdraw cycle. When you reached out, they pulled back. When they pulled back, you reached out more. Both of you were activated constantly. You agreed to 60 days of intentional distance—no contact except for necessary logistics.

How distance helped:

Week 1-2: Withdrawal symptoms. You wanted to reach out constantly. You didn't.

Week 3-4: Your nervous system started regulating. You could see the pattern more clearly—you pursued because distance activated your abandonment fears, not because reaching out was actually helpful.

Week 5-8: You built your own sources of regulation—routine, friendships, therapy. You started missing them less frantically.

Week 9-12: Clarity emerged. You could see that the relationship wasn't sustainable without both people learning to regulate independently. The distance created space to see that.

What helped:

  • The distance had a purpose and a timeline
  • You used the time to build capacity, not just wait
  • You respected the boundary even when it was hard
  • Both people worked on their own patterns

The outcome: After 90 days, you reconnected briefly. You could see that while you cared about each other, the structural issues remained. Distance gave you clarity to let go without resentment.


Scenario 2 — Distance that hardens: Indefinite avoidance

What happened:

After a difficult breakup, you said you "needed space." But you didn't define what that meant or how long. Six months passed. You didn't reach out. Neither did they. You told yourself you were "healing," but mostly you were avoiding feeling anything.

How distance hardened:

You weren't working on yourself—you were numbing. You weren't building capacity—you were frozen. Months passed with no clarity, no growth, just avoidance. Resentment built because they didn't reach out (even though you asked for space). You built a narrative where they were the villain and you were the victim.

What went wrong:

  • Distance had no purpose or timeline—just avoidance
  • You weren't working on capacity; you were waiting
  • You used distance to avoid processing the loss
  • Resentment grew instead of softening

The outcome: A year later, you still felt stuck. The relationship was over, but you hadn't moved forward. Distance became a way to avoid grief, not create clarity.


Scenario 3 — Distance as manipulation: Using space to make them miss you

What happened:

You initiated "no contact" not to heal or create clarity, but to make them miss you. You read advice saying "absence makes the heart grow fonder." You cut off contact hoping they'd panic and come back. You checked their social media obsessively to see if they were missing you.

How distance failed:

This wasn't distance—it was a tactic. You weren't working on yourself. You were performing "doing well" hoping they'd see it. You reached out sporadically with breadcrumbs to keep them attached. You weren't healing; you were strategizing.

What went wrong:

  • Distance was manipulation, not clarity-seeking
  • You weren't building capacity; you were hoping absence would change their mind
  • You used space as a control tactic, not genuine boundary
  • You weren't respecting the distance; you were gaming it

The outcome: They didn't come back. And even if they had, nothing would have changed because you hadn't done any actual work.


Scenario 4 — Distance that helps: Creating space for both to grow

What happened:

You loved each other, but the relationship was unsustainable. You couldn't repair after conflict. Your attachment patterns clashed constantly. You agreed to 90 days apart to each work on your own capacity—therapy, regulation skills, understanding your patterns—with the possibility of reconnecting after.

How distance helped:

You used the time intentionally. You worked with a therapist on your anxious attachment patterns. You learned to regulate your nervous system. You built skills for repair and boundaries. They did similar work on their avoidant patterns.

After 90 days, you reconnected. The structural issues were still there, but you both had more capacity. You tried again with new tools.

What helped:

  • Distance was intentional and boundaried
  • Both people used the time to build capacity
  • You respected the timeline and didn't reach out
  • You came back with skills, not just hope

The outcome: It didn't work long-term, but the second attempt taught you both that incompatibility was real. The distance gave you clarity and closure. You separated without bitterness.


Scenario 5 — Distance that hardens: One person quietly quitting

What happened:

They said they "needed space to think." But really, they'd already decided to leave and didn't have the courage to say so. They used "space" as a soft exit. Weeks turned into months. They responded sporadically, keeping you in limbo. You waited, hoping distance would help them see clearly. But they were already gone.

How distance hardened:

This wasn't intentional distance—it was quiet quitting disguised as space. They kept you on the hook with vague reassurances. You waited in limbo, unable to move forward or let go. Resentment built. Your life froze. They moved on while you waited.

What went wrong:

  • Distance wasn't mutual or honest—one person was avoiding the hard conversation
  • You were waiting; they were already gone
  • "Space" was used to avoid accountability
  • No clarity emerged because honesty was missing

The outcome: Months later, they officially ended it. The distance was cruelty, not kindness. If they'd been honest from the start, you could have started healing sooner.


Key insights across scenarios

Distance helps when:

  • It has purpose, boundaries, and timeline
  • Both people respect it (even if one wanted it more)
  • You use the time to build capacity, not just wait
  • It breaks activation cycles and creates clarity

Distance hardens when:

  • It's indefinite avoidance with no purpose
  • One person is quietly quitting but won't say so
  • It's used as manipulation or control
  • Resentment builds instead of clarity

The question: What is this distance actually for?


Related reading