Reflection & Exercises
Exercise 1 — The Relationship Autopsy (20 Minutes)
You cannot fix what you don't understand. You must identify the "Cause of Death" for Relationship 1.0.
Instructions:
Write down the top 3 dynamic patterns that led to the breakup. Be specific. Not "we fought," but "I would criticize their lack of ambition, and they would withdraw to play video games."
-
Pattern A: _________________________________________________
- My role: _________________________________________________
- Their role: ______________________________________________
-
Pattern B: _________________________________________________
- My role: _________________________________________________
- Their role: ______________________________________________
-
Pattern C: _________________________________________________
- My role: _________________________________________________
- Their role: ______________________________________________
The Test: If you show this list to your partner, would they agree? If not, you are not ready to reconcile.
Exercise 2 — The "New Contract" (30 Minutes)
If you are restarting, you need new terms. This is a literal negotiation.
Draft your "Must Haves" for Relationship 2.0:
- Example: "We must have a 20-minute check-in every Sunday night."
- Example: "We are not moving back in together for at least 6 months."
-
-
-
Draft your "Deal Breakers" (The Exit Clause):
- Example: "If you give me the silent treatment for more than 24 hours, the relationship ends."
-
-
Exercise 3 — The Probation Period Plan
Healthy reconciliation has phases. Define them.
Phase 1: Dating (Months 1-3)
- Rules: No sleepovers every night. Keep separate hobbies. Focus on fun and talking.
- Goal: Re-establish friendship.
Phase 2: Integration (Months 3-6)
- Rules: Integrate friends. Discuss deeper future goals.
- Goal: Test compatibility in the real world.
Phase 3: Commitment (Month 6+)
- Rules: Discuss living situations/long term.
- Goal: Full partnership.
Write your own timeline. Don't just slide back into marriage-level intensity on Day 1.
Exercise 4 — The "Why Now?" Interrogation
Ask yourself (and answer honestly):
"Why do I want to try again right now?"
- Is it because I'm lonely? (Bad reason)
- Is it because I'm jealous they are dating? (Bad reason)
- Is it because I genuinely see that we have both grown and the timing is now right? (Good reason)
If your answer is emotional relief, pause. If your answer is structural alignment, proceed.
Exercise 5 — The Evidence Log (14 Days)
Purpose: Track behavioral proof rather than promises.
Each day, write:
- One action that shows accountability
- One action that shows repair
- One action that shows respect for boundaries
If you can’t log evidence for two weeks, you’re likely running on hope instead of change.
Exercise 6 — The Rebuild Scorecard
Rate each 0–10:
- Regulation under stress
- Repair after conflict
- Mutual effort balance
- Transparency (no hiding, no “tests”)
- Pace (not rushed)
Total score under 30 = slow down or pause.
Exercise 7 — Repair Script Practice (10 Minutes)
Write and rehearse:
“I’m noticing the old pattern. I’m going to pause, regulate, and return. I care about this and want to do it differently.”
Repeat this out loud until it feels natural.
: Research TODO: Add citations for structured reconciliation pacing and repair practices.
Clinical & Research Foundations
This chapter integrates findings from peer-reviewed psychiatry, psychology, and relationship science, including attachment theory, trauma research, sexual health medicine, and evidence-based couples therapy.
Research & Clinical Sources
Key Sources
- Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2000). The timing of divorce. Journal of Family Psychology, 14(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.14.1.5
- Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in Adulthood. https://doi.org/10.1037/11435-000
- Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and Recovery. Basic Books.
- Ten Brinke, L., et al. (2016). Moral psychology of dishonesty. Psychological Science, 27(1), 2–14.
- Christensen, A., et al. (2010). Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy. JCCP, 78(2), 193–204.